Previous Page  21 / 23 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 23 Next Page
Page Background

Page 61

allied

academies

August 17-18, 2017 | Toronto, Canada

ANNUAL BIOTECHNOLOGY CONGRESS

Ann Biol Sci, 2017

ISSN: 2348-1927

Genetic transformation of locally developed two cotton varieties [CRSP1 and CRSP2] with Bt and

glyphosate tolerant genes

Shafique Ahmed

University of the Punjab, Pakistan

E

xpression of the transgene with a desirable character in

crop plant is the ultimate goal of transgenic research.

Transformation of two Bt genes namely Cry1Ac and Cry2A

cloned as separate cassette under 35S promoter in pKHG4

plant expression vector was done by using shoot apex cut

method of Agrobacterium. Molecular confirmation of

putative transgenic cotton plants for Cry1Ac, Cry2A and

GT gene was done through PCR and ELISA. Transformation

efficiency of CRSP-1 and CRSP-2 was calculated to be 1.2

and 0.8% for Cry1Ac while 0.9 and 0.6% for Cry2A and 1.5

and 0.7% for GTG respectively. CRSP-1 was found to adopt

natural environment (acclimatized) earlier than CRSP-

2 when exposed to sunlight for one month. Expression

of Cry1Ac, Cry2A and GTG was found to be 1.2, 1 and 1.3

ng/μl respectively for CRSP-1 as compared to CRSP-2

where expression was recorded to be 0.9, 0.5 and 0.9 ng/

μl respectively. FISH analysis of the transgenic CRSP-1 and

CRSP-2 demonstrated the presence of one and two copy

numbers respectively. Similarly, the response of CRSP-1

against Glyphosate @1900 ml/acre was far better with

almost negligible necrotic spot and efficient growth after

spray as compared to CRSP-2 where some plants were found

to have necrosis and negative control where the complete

decay of plant was observed after seven days of spray assay.

Similarly, almost 100% mortality of 2nd instar larvae of

Heliothis armigera was recorded after three days in CRSP-1

as compared to CRSP-2 where insect mortality was found

to be less than 90%. Quantitatively speaking non transgenic

plants were found with 23–90% leaf damage by insect, while

CRSP-1 was with less than 5% and CRSP-2 with 17%. Taken

together CRSP1 was found to have better insect control and

weedicide resistance along with its natural ability of genetic

modification and can be employed by the valuable farmers

for better insect control and simultaneously for better

production.

e:

shafiq@cemb.edu.pk

Ann Biol Sci, 2017, 5:3

DOI: 10.21767/2348-1927-C1-003