Previous Page  48 / 65 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 48 / 65 Next Page
Page Background

Page 72

May 24-25, 2018

London, UK

Vascular Surgery 2018

3

rd

Edition of World Congress & Exhibition on

Vascular Surgery

Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy

ISSN: 2573-4482

A

lthough penile implantation remains a final solution for

patients with refractory impotence in many urologists,

undesirable postoperative effects, including the development of

pale appearance, size reduction and cold sensation of the glans

penis in particularly the penile size itself, remain problematic.

We sought to report an innovative surgical method designed

to avoid these problems. From 2003 to 2017, 103 consecutive

patients received a malleable penile implant. Of these 68 men

(the enhancing group, after 2008) were also treated with venous

ligation of the retrocoronal venous plexus, deep dorsal vein, and

cavernosal veins in addition to standard penile implant. The

remaining 35 men formed the control group, treated with only

a penile implant. Follow-up ranged from 0.5 to 14.5 (8.7±1.0)

years. Although preoperative glanular dimension did not differ

significantly between the two groups, significant respective

difference at one day and one year postoperatively was found

in the glanular circumference (128.6±6.8 mm versus 115.5±7.1

mm and 131.6±7.2 mm versus 100.3±7.3 mm; both <0.05),

radius (38.9±2.7 mm versus 37.0±2.8 mm and 41.7±2.6 mm

versus 33.7±2.9 mm; latter <0.01), and satisfaction rate (95.8%

versus 53.2%, <0.01) as well. Inconclusive analysis of the penile

copulatory portion ensued resulting from difficulty in practical

measurement on this portion. Based on our results, selective

venous ligation of penile erection related veins appears to

enhance the glans penis dimension and probable the penile

copulatory portion in implant patients:

Recent Publications

1. Hsu G L, Chen H S, Hsieh C H, Lee W Y, Chen K L and

Chang C H (2010) Clinical experience of a refined penile

venous surgery procedure for patients with erectile

dysfunction: is it a viable option? Journal of Andrology

31(3):271-280.

2. Hsieh C H, Liu S P, Hsu G L, Chen H S, Molodysky E, Chen

Y H and Yu H J (2012) Advances in our understanding

of mammalian penile evolution, human penile anatomy

and human erection physiology: clinical implications

for physicians and surgeons. Medical Science Monitor

18(7):RA118-125.

A strategy for glans enhancement and negating glans

coldness in patient with penile prosthesis implantation

Chi Can Huynh

1

and

Geng Long Hsu

2, 3

1

The Male Clinic, Australia

2

Hsu’s Andrology, Taiwan

3

National Taiwan University, Taiwan

Chi Can Huynh et al., J Vasc Endovasc Therapy 2018, Volume 3

DOI: 10.21767/2573-4482-C1-002

Figure 1:

Pelvic x-ray film of 30∘oblique view of a 65-year-old male. (A) He

underwent a Duraphase penile implantation somewhere in 2005. A cold

glans syndrome and reduced plans volume prompted him to receive the ve-

nous ligation surgery. (B) A spongiosogram disclosed the deep dorsal vein

and the cavernosal vein via contrast injection to the glans penis. (C) The

glans radius was enhanced from 28 mm to 34 mm after the penile venous

surgery on the retrocoronal plexus. Meanwhile, a proximal ligation was per-

formed on the deep dorsal vein and cavernosal vein at the penile hilum. (D)

A postoperative spongiosogram disclosed the injected contrast was reten-

tion in the deep dorsal vein and the cavernosal vein. An enhancement was

demonstrated in both the glans penis and entire penile shaft after a contrast

mediumwas injected into the glans penis via a #23 scalp needle