Previous Page  14 / 17 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 17 Next Page
Page Background

Page 104

May 24-25, 2018

London, UK

Vascular Surgery 2018

3

rd

Edition of World Congress & Exhibition on

Vascular Surgery

Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy

ISSN: 2573-4482

Background:

Currently the preferred treatment method for

abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is endovascular aneurysm

repair (EVAR) due to benefits associatedwith aminimally invasive

procedure over open repair. Limitations of EVAR include limited

applicability, higher rates of endoleak and reintervention. A novel

technique aiming to overcome these limitations is endovascular

sealing (EVAS), using the Nellix device.

Aims:

Retrospectiveserviceevaluationwasperformedto:evaluate

outcomes of all patients treated with EVAS at Southampton

General Hospital (SGH). Explore any difference in outcome

between EVAS patients treated within the Nellix instructions for

use (IFU) versus those outside it.

Methods:

Data including aneurysm morphology and

demographics from all patients treated with EVAS at SGH was

collected retrospectively from patient records and computed

tomography scans. This was utilized for assessment of survival

at 30 days and 1 year, and occurrence of aneurysm related

complications or reintervention post-EVAS.

Results:

1/26 study patients was female. Mean age and baseline

eGFR was 76.9±6 and 62.7±21.4 respectively. 11/26 patients

were treated off-IFU. No deaths occurred within 30 days post-

operatively. Overall, 5 mortalities occurred by 1 year post-op

- none were aneurysm related. 3/5 deaths occurred in patients

treated off-IFU. Difference in survival between patients treated

within vs. off-IFU was not statistically significant (p=0.176; log-

rank, p=0.260; generalized Wilcoxon). Three patients developed

aneurysm related complications, however only one reintervention

was performed.

Conclusion:

Mortality post-EVAS was higher than expected - may

be reflective of high risk patients chosen for a novel technique

due to unsuitability for other treatment modalities. Endoleak and

reintervention rates are low in line with other centers. Longitudinal

studies evaluating long-term outcomes post-EVAS are needed to

demonstrate its role in the treatment of AAAs.

maa3g15@soton.ac.uk

Evaluation of the utility of endovascular sealing for aortic

aneurysmal disease

Augustine M A

and

Nordon I

University of Southampton, UK

J Vasc Endovasc Therapy 2018, Volume 3

DOI: 10.21767/2471-8084-C1-003