Previous Page  11 / 17 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 17 Next Page
Page Background

Page 101

May 24-25, 2018

London, UK

Vascular Surgery 2018

3

rd

Edition of World Congress & Exhibition on

Vascular Surgery

Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy

ISSN: 2573-4482

Objective:

to evaluate the efficiency of the hemodialysis catheter

in the femoral tunnel as durable access for patients with

hemodialysis.

Introduction:

Vascular access (VA) continues to be the keystone

in cases requiring hemodialysis (HD). When the choices of arterial

venous fistula, grafts, and thoracic central catheters are depleted,

the case’s life becomes at risk. The extra options are limited to

transplantation, peritoneal dialysis, insertion of the trans lumbar

and femoral catheter. The Last may, in lots of cases, be the best

choice. We present our experience at the Matarya Teaching

Hospital with 17 cases where all vascular accesses was depleted

and no transplant or peritoneal dialysis could be performed.

Therefore, we chose the femoral tunnel catheter (FTC) as VA

durable and unique. The median follow-up period was 10 months

(2-14 months). The median age of cases was 55 (40-70) years.

In ten cases, a Permcath (Hickman access system, BARD) and

the other seven are inserted (DURAFLOW, from AngioDynamics).

All cases received warfarin after passing LMWH to prevent

thrombosis of the catheter. All catheters were functional for

2 months. The mean blood flow was 230 ml / min (200-260 ml

/ min). Two cases died at 5 and 12 months respectively with a

functional catheter due to causes not directly related to the FTC.

In a patient, the site of the catheter was changed to 5 months due

to an accidental catheter slipping. A catheter has been changed

because the flow has become inadequate after 8 months. No

patient had deep vein thrombosis. In one patient, the catheter

was operated for 14 months after insertion. We conclude that

the femoral catheter in the tunnel is a stable option in cases with

depleted VA.

Recent Publications

1. PervezA,ZamanF,AslamA,etal.Portcatheterplacement

by nephrologists in an interventional nephrology training

program. Semin Dial 2004; 71:61-4.

2. Mermel LA. Prevention of intravascular catheter-

related infection. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:391-402.

[PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

3. Daniel T, Murai MD. Are femoral broviac catheters

effective and safe? A prospective comparison of femoral

and jugular boviac catheters in newborn infants. Chest

2002; 121:1527-30.

4. Pierco CM, Wade A, Moke Q, et al. Heparin-bonded

central venous lines reduce thrombotic and infective

complications in critically ill children. Intensive CareMed

2000; 26:967-72.

5. Joynt GM, Kew J, Gomersall CD, et al. Deep venous

thrombosis caused by femoral venous catheters in

critically ill adult patients. Chest 2000; 117:178-83.

[PUBMED] [FULLTEXT].

Biography

Assem is a junior cosultant vascular surgeon in Matarya Teaching Hospital;

Cairo; Egypt.one of the big vascular centres in Egypt. He has a fair experi-

ence in both open and endovascular procedures.MSC.MRCS. & M.D.

assemherz010@hotmail.com

Femoral Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter as a permanent

access for hemodialysis patients

Herzallah AM

Matarya Teaching Hospital, Egypt.

Herzallah AM, J Vasc Endovasc Therapy 2018, Volume 3

DOI: 10.21767/2573-4482-C1-003