Previous Page  14 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

Preventive Medicine 2018

Journal of Preventive Medicine

ISSN: 2572-5483

Page 63

July 16-17, 2018

London, UK

9

th

Edition of International Conference on

Preventive Medicine

& Public Health

Background:

Factors contributing to successful quitting are

dynamics in nature and difficult to predict. This study attempted

to identify factors that promote quit attempts at first visit able

to predict success rates among smokers treated with standard

smoking cessation treatment programme and the modified UK

standard treatment plan from NHS Centre for Smoking Cessation

and Training (NCSCT).

Methods:

This was a double arms cluster-randomized control trial

with follow-up to 6-months. All 19 public hospitals in Malaysia

that offered quit smoking services (QSS) were randomized in to

intervention (n=10) and control (n=9) groups. The smokers were

required to complete self-administered questionnaires on their

first visit and were followed up at 4-week, 3-month and 6-month.

The health staff in the intervention group were trained with the

UK adapted training module to treat smokers (n=330) and the

control group continued with the standard treatment programme

(n=172). The association between both groups was analyzed

using univariate analysis. Multiple logistic regression backward

elimination was carried out to assess the repeated measures

treatment effect of quitting.

Results:

There was no significant difference between intervention

and control group in most demographic and characteristics of

smoking habits such as mean age, education level, marital status,

perceived health problem and age started smoking. However,

there were significant differences on the first cigarette of the day

(P=0.05a), urges to smoke (0.020a), methods of quitting (0.018a)

and CO level at base line (0.0234d). Interestingly, there was no

significant difference on their motivations and confident levels

to quit smoking between both groups even though the control

group reported they were more worried about their future health

(p= 0.030a), concerned about the effect of cigarettes smoke

to their family (p<0.0001a), smoking is expensive (p=0.001a),

family wanting them to stop smoking (p<0.0001a), family

nagging (p=0.001a), ashamed to be a smoker (p<0.0001a), had

a family who had quitted successfully (p= 0.017a) and friends

encouragement to quit (p=0.002a). The intervention group

showed higher success rates with carbon-monoxide validated at

4-week (p=0.013a), 3-month (p<0.0001a) and 6-month follow-up

(p<0.0001a)

Conclusions:

Factors that promote quit attempts at first visit may

not predict successful quitting at 4-week, 3-month and 6-month

follow-up.

weeleihum@ukm.edu.my

Are factors that promote quit attempts on first visit predicts

success at 1-month, 3-month and 6-month follow-up between

smokers treated with standard smoking cessation programme

and the modified UK standard treatment plan?

Wee Lei Hum

1

, Komathi Perialathan

2

, Ho Bee Kiau

2

, Azman Ahmad

2

, Aziman Mah-

di

2

, Abu Bakar Abdul Rahman

2

, Swinderjit Jagsingh

3

, Lena Yeap

1

and

Mohd Haniki

Nik Mohammed

4

1

National University of Malaysia, Malaysia

2

Ministry of Health Malaysia, Malaysia

3

National Cancer Society of Malaysia, Malaysia

4

International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia

J Prev Med 2018, Volume 3

DOI: 10.21767/2572-5483-C1-003