Previous Page  15 / 17 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 17 Next Page
Page Background

Pediatrics Conference 2018

Journal of Pediatric Care

ISSN: 2471-805X

Page 52

March 26-27, 2018

Edinburgh, Scotland

2

nd

Edition of International Congress on

Pediatrics

I

n 2014 the American Academy of Pediatrics revised prior

2006 guidelines on bronchiolitis treatment. This study aimed

to compare outcomes in the emergency department (ED) in a

major academic medical center pediatric emergency department

after implementing new recommendations, specifically length

of emergency department stay and time to decision to admit.

Secondarily the use of treatment and diagnostics were compared

pre and post implementation of guidelines. A retrospective review

of infants under 12 months of age that presented to our pediatric

tertiary center’s academic ED from 2012-2016 bronchiolitis

seasons was performed. Winter of 2015 is when the ED and

pediatric department made a combined effort to strictly follow

the 2014 AAP guidelines. Those with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis

were included. Previous reactive airway disease and wheezing

patients were not excluded for this study. Data collected included

time of placement in a room in the ED to time of discharge or time

to pediatrics consult (for admission). Other data collected for

each patient included who received a chest x-ray (CXR), nebulizer

treatment, RSV PCR, or any form of steroid. There was no

significant difference in the ED length of stay, nor in the time-to-

decide for admission of patients after the 2014 AAP bronchiolitis

guidelines were applied. There was a significant reduction in the

overall number of treatment and diagnostic modalities used post-

implementation suggesting a potential cost-effective strategy of

care.

nick.mancuso@uky.edu

Bronchiolitis guideline changes and effects in a pediatric

emergency department

Nicholas Mancuso, Craig Carter, Jeffrey Bennett, Susan Robbins

and

Landon Jones

University of Kentucky, USA

J Pediatr Care, Volume 4

DOI: 10.21767/2471-805X-C1-006