Previous Page  7 / 7
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 7
Page Background

Journal of Nursing and Health Studies

ISSN: 2574-2825

April 23-25, 2018

Rome, Italy

Nursing Education 2018

Page 36

27

th

Edition of World Congress on

Nursing Education &

Research

Introduction:

Critical care nursing in South Africa experiences

a crisis. Nurse leaders, managers and the public opinion reveal

poor standards of nursing care, which is confirmed by headlines

in the media. At the heart of these challenges and plaguing

health care services lays the disengagement of nurses from their

work and workplace cultures.

Objective:

Reflecting on the crisis in critical care nursing,

academics from the Department of Nursing Science, University

of Pretoria, envisioned facilitation of change through practice

development. Practice development is a continuous process

which has the intent to address existing workplace cultures and

bring about change towards the development of person-centred

cultures. The process is enabled by facilitators. A three year

practice development programme was initiated in September

2013. The first objective was to explore the current workplace

cultures in selected public and private critical care units in

Gauteng.

Methods:

Practice development as a methodology was used to

observe the workplace culture through utilising the Workplace

Culture Critical Analysis Tool. A total of 230 hours of observation

in 11 critical care units (six public and four private) was done.

The observation was conducted by internal (critical care nurses)

and external (academia) observers in four phases. The phases

included pre-observation, observation, consiousness raising and

problematisation, reflection and critique. The data was analysed

using a creative hermeneutic data analysis method.

Results:

The “Big 7” challenges relating to workplace culture in

critical care practice were identified, namely: care and caring,

communication, therapeutic environment, team effectiveness,

learning environment, time management and professionalism

(not in order of priority).

Conclusion:

Using practice development as a methodology

allowed critical care nurses to collaborate with academia and

participate in data collection and analysis. Participating with the

critical care nurses provided themwith an opportunity to observe

their practice, raise awareness for taken-for-granted practices

and reflect on these practices. Stepping outside their usual role

of doing and getting inside the prevailing workplace culture

provided the first step for taking action and addressing change.

Biography

Prof T Heyns is a senior lecturer at University of Pretoria for past 19 years

involved in the education and training of pre-graduate and post-graduate

students. Her area of clinical expertise is Emergemcy Nursing Care. She

has supervised post-graduate scholars to completion a total of 41Masters

and 3 PhD students.. Currently she is supervising 11 Masters and 10 PhD

students. She is an external examiner at several national and international

universities, has examined 25 Masters dissertations and 9 PhD thesis. She

has presented at various National and International Conferences relating

Trauma and Emergency care aswell as Practice development in the Critical

Care environment. She has 20 published article in National and Internation-

al Journals and is a lead researcher in an International Practice develop-

ment research project with NRF Funding. She is a Fellow of the Academia

of Nursing in South Africa (FANSA), as well as the past president of the

Emergency Nursing Society of South Africa.

tanya.heyns@up.ac.za

Making workplace culture in critical care

visible: the “Big 7”

Tanya Heyns

University of Pretoria, South Africa

Tanya Heyns, J Nurs Health Stud 2018, Volume 3

DOI: 10.21767/2574-2825-C1-001