Previous Page  14 / 15 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 15 Next Page
Page Background

E u r o S c i C o n C o n f e r e n c e o n

Dental & Dental

Hygiene

Dental & Dental Hygiene 2018

Journal of Dental and Craniofacial Research

ISSN 2576-392X

M a r c h 2 6 - 2 7 , 2 0 1 8

E d i n b u r g h , S c o t l a n d

Page 49

C

ompletely edentulous patients often have problems with their complete

dentures; a treatment modality of using two, four or six implants to

support overdentures has been proposed to improve the retention as well

as the stability of the conventional denture, in addition to preserving the

residual alveolar bone. Several worldwide research studies tested the impact

of implant-assisted overdentures on satisfaction and quality of life and

concluded that individuals with implant-assisted overdentures were more

satisfied and had a better oral health quality than others with conventional

dentures. Implant-supported overdentures are indicated in clinical conditions

requiring high values of retention and stability such as cases of high muscle

attachments. Implant-retained overdentures offered a simpler, cheaper and

equally successful prosthetic solution compared to the fixed restorations

in the rehabilitation of maladapted edentulous mandibles. Moreover, they

provide enhanced masticatory function, higher patients' satisfaction and

quality of life than the conventional complete dentures. Systematic reviews

comparing implant-supported overdentures retained by utilizing a wide range

of attachment mechanisms were recently published. The implant-supported

treatment modality might be in the form of splinted implants (e.g. bar-retained

overdentures), or unsplinted implants (as in case of ball, locator or magnetic

attachments). Owing to the smaller space requirements, ease of cleaning,

more economical achievement and lower technique sensitivity; unsplinted

attachments have been preferred over splinted ones. The most common

maintenance requirement of any overdentures attachment, found to be the

renewal or reactivation of the retentive element. Inadequate inter-arch space

was found to be one of the major causes of bulk fracture of the acrylic denture

base. Furthermore, it might lead to inappropriate positioning of the denture

teeth with subsequent esthetic and phonetic problems. Locator’s attachments

presented the lowest profile of the currently available stud attachments.

Findings suggested that depending on the attachment system used, the

degree of patient satisfaction is directly affected by the amount of retention

and stability of the implant-supported overdentures. Learning objectives

of this presentation will be, detailed amplification of the implant-supported

overdentures, measuring the degree of patient satisfaction, simplifying the

procedures of overdentures construction, practical measurements of optimum

number of implants to be utilized and different construction approaches of

implant-assisted overdentures in both arches.

Biography

Mostafa Helmy Mostafa Ahmed completed PhD (Doctor De-

gree) in Implant Prosthetic Dentistry, Kasr El Aini, Cairo Univer-

sity in 2013, MSc (Master’s Degree) in Implant Prosthetic Den-

tistry, Kasr El Aini, Cairo University in 2010. He is an Associate

Professor in Prosthetic Department, Cairo University and was a

Lecturer in Prosthetic Department, Cairo University from 2010

to 2013. He was a Demonstrator in Prosthetic Department, Cai-

ro University from 2007 to 2010. He was a Resident in Prosthet-

ic Department, Cairo University from 2004-2007. He completed

BA degree from the Faculty of Dentistry in the year 2002.

dr.mostafahelmy@hotmail.com

Implant-assisted overdentures: a paradigm relocation and

simplification

Mostafa Helmy Mostafa Ahmed

Cairo University, Egypt

Mostafa Helmy Mostafa Ahmed, J Den Craniofac Res 2018, Volume: 3

DOI: 10.21767/2576-392X-C1-002