Previous Page  14 / 17 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 17 Next Page
Page Background

Page 65

allied

academies

August 14-16, 2017 | Toronto, Canada

BRAIN DISORDERS AND DEMENTIA CARE

4

th

International Conference on

Neurosurg, an open access journal

ISSN: 2471-9633

Proposed new classification of behaviors in dementia

Atul Sunny Luthra

Homewood Health Centre, Canada

Objectives:

Currently,thereisavastheterogeneityinterminology

and classification of behaviors used in dementia care, with no

universally accepted classification system. This presentation will

establish and discuss in detail clinically meaningful categories

for the classification of behaviors, using a new behavioral scale

called LuBAIR (Luthra’s Behavioral Assessment and Intervention

Response.) It is intended for audiences of all disciplines and

backgrounds in geriatric psychiatry and dementia/NCD.

Methods:

Criteria proposed by Davis, Buckwalter and Burgio

(1997) were identified as the basis for classification of behaviors

in dementia. A review of the literature was done to identify

the “Specification of the Theoretical Construct” (STC) to justify

aggregation of similar behavioral symptoms into clinically

meaningful categories.

Results:

STC identified are divided into four behavioral

constructs used to categorize behaviors in dementia: Theories

of information processing, theories based in motivation

and needs, theories based in the regulation of emotions,

and theories based in compliance and aggression. Each

construct is subdivided into different categories: Theories of

information processing (TIP): disorganized behaviors (DOB)

and misidentification behaviors (MiB); motivational and needs-

based theories: apathy behaviors (AB), goal-directed behaviors

(GDB), motor behaviors (MB), and importuning behaviors (IB);

theories on the regulation of emotions: emotional behaviors

(EB), fretful/trepidated behaviors (FTB), and vocal behaviors

(VB); theories on compliance and aggression: oppositional

behaviors (OB), and physically aggressive behaviors (PAB).

Discussion:

The STC identified for these behavioral constructs

result from alterations of the physiological and emotional

statuses of patients with dementia. Physiologically, DOB and

MiB occur due to fragmentation of information processing and,

for MiB specifically, the breakdown of schema identification and

pattern recognition. Motivational and needs-based behaviors

stem from changes in motivational drives; while GDB and IB

result from an increase in motivational drive in detection and

fulfillness of needs of “belongingness” and physiological needs

(respectively). Motor behaviors (MB) are due to varying degrees

of changes in motivational drives, and are concomitants to

other behavioral categories. EB and FTB are based in the

expression of negative emotions; feelings of melancholy

and discontentment give rise to EB to allow for catharsis

and subsequent decompression from pain, and FTB express

emotions of fear, illustrating insecurity needs to caregivers. VB

can be based in both emotions of joy or anger, and highlight

the “out of proportion” nature of patient responses. Finally,

oppositional behaviors (OB) are determined by the degree of

cognitive impairment of patients with dementia, and result

from non-compliance with direction, where PAB occur due to a

patient’s perceived impediment in goal attainment.

e:

SLuthra@homewoodhealth.com

Neurosurg 2017, 2:2

DOI: 10.21767/2471-9633-C1-006