Previous Page  15 / 23 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 23 Next Page
Page Background

Notes:

Volume 4

Journal of Pediatric Care

ISSN: 2471-805X

Page 34

JOINT EVENT

August 06-07, 2018 Madrid, Spain

&

2

nd

Edition of International Conference on

Adolescent Health & Medicine

18

th

International Conference on

Pediatrics Health

Pediatrics Health 2018

&

Adolescent Health 2018

August 06-07, 2018

The lack of confirmatory clinical signs in child sexual abuse evaluation

Johanna Maria Kotze

University of the Free State, South Africa

P

erpetrators of child sexual abuse are commonly acquitted based on wrong facts. Expert medical witnesses play a major

role in the explanation of medical findings. Health care providers may experience a perceived responsibility to prove

that child sexual abuse has taken place. In truth, the function of an expert medical witness is to educate the courts and to

introduce reliable medical knowledge to other professionals in court and thus complement the search for the truth. From

the side of the courts, there still exists an expectation that child sexual abuse can be confirmed or ruled out by means of a

medical evaluation. Experience shows that the question most frequently asked to an expert medical witness is to explain why

the absence of confirmatory clinical signs does not exclude child sexual abuse. The aim of the presentation is to provide the

basic knowledge and understanding expert medical witnesses need to step into the witness box with confidence and explain

medical principles scientifically in a language understandable to people outside the medical field. The explanation of normal

findings in child sexual abuse cases range over a basic knowledge of evaluation protocol; understanding of relevant aspects of

acknowledged definitions, criminology, the way children express themselves, physiology and insight into the part a clinician

plays in the complete investigation of child sexual abuse. The presentation introduces the examination protocol and moves

on to explain why a normal or non-specific clinical evaluation does not negate child sexual abuse. The focus is on the sexual

abuse of prepubertal children but touches on the sexual abuse and rape of adolescents. A brief summary of the interpretation

of normal and abnormal clinical findings conclude the presentation. The presentation aims to equip health care providers to

support the courts efficiently in child sexual abuse cases.

Biography

Marianne has completed MB ChB at the University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa and Dip For Med (SA) Clin at the Colleges of Medicine of South

Africa. She is affiliated with the Departments of Forensic Medicine and Family Medicine, Free State University. She is also involved with training in Clinical Forensic

Medicine for the Free State Department of Health. She is running a service for the clinical forensic assessment of children who have possibly been sexually abused.

She has vast experience as expert medical witness in child sexual abuse cases. Her publications focus around practical aspects of evaluation in rape cases, child

sexual abuse cases and clinical forensic documentation.

maraisJM@ufs.ac.za

Johanna Maria Kotze, J Pediatr Care 2018, Volume 4

DOI: 10.21767/2471-805X-C3-011