Previous Page  7 / 10 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 10 Next Page
Page Background

Advanced Dental Care 2018

Dentistry and Craniofacial Research

ISSN: 2576-392X

Page 17

October 08-09, 2018

Moscow, Russia

26

th

International Conference on

Advanced Dental Care

F

or this split mouth randomized study nine adult New

Zealand rabbits were considered. The control side of the

mandible was augmented with autograft block harvested

from the iliac crest, while xenograft was used on the test

side (Heket Biomaterials, Vicenza, Italy). Dimensions of the

graft were 10 mm diameter x 3 mm height. Recipient bed

sites were equally perforated. Grafts were fixed with 1.5x10

mm titanium positional screws and covered with a collagen

membrane (Heket Biomaterials, Vicenza, Italy). Three animals

were sacrificed at 07, 20 and 60 days respectively. Biopsies

were taken for histological analysis. Paraffin sections were

stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin and Masson´s Trichrome.

At 07 days, xenografts showed a scaffold with empty

lacunae, while autografts presented a complex pristine bone

architecture including osteocytes and bone marrow. Blood clot

and inflammatory cells infiltration were observed arising from

recipient bed perforations in both groups. At 20 days, a sparse

immature and non-organized new bone formation was found

for xenograft, while autograft presented an intense woven bone

formation. Osteoblast bone matrix deposition and osteoclast

resorption activity was also observed as part of remodelling

bone process. For both autograft and xenograft groups, a

clear delimitation between graft and recipient bed was still

noticed. However, at this time, graft union was more evident for

autograft. New bone was found forming mostly from recipient

bed perforations and close to the membrane for both groups.

At 60 days, xenograft showed a higher level of resorption when

compared to autografts. Graft union became bridged by well-

organized bone for both groups. Considering the limitations of

the present study, it can be suggested that autograft provides a

better bone formation and maintenance overtime.

Biography

Samuel P Xavier (Oral and Maxillofacial Specialist since 1995) has complet-

ed his PhD from Sao Paulo State University, Brazil and Postdoctoral studies

from University of Freiburg, Germany (2008-2009) respectively. He is cur-

rently working as an Associate Professor in the Department of Oral Maxillo-

facial Surgery and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry at University of Sao

Paulo. He has published more than 50 papers in reputed journals and is a

Member of the Board of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons at the Hospital

of the Medical Faculty of University of Sao Paulo since 1997.

samuelpxavier@yahoo.com.br

Comparative analysis of autogenous vs.

xenogenous bone grafts in rabbit mandible:

Preliminary histological results

Samuel P Xavier

1

, Erick R Silva

1

, Dimitrius L Pitol

1

, Lucas B Chaves

1

, Vitor F Bal-

an

1

and Daniele Botticelli

2

1

University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

2

ARDEC Academy, Italy

Samuel P Xavier et al., Dent Craniofac Res 2018, Volume 3

DOI: 10.21767/2576-392X-C4-011