Introduction

Brucellosis is an infectious disease brought on by genus Brucella, a Gram-negative intracellular cocco-bacilli, show an extensive variety of species-specificity and bringing on a serious disease in both animals and humans [1]. Brucella exhibit in eight species: Brucella abortus (influencing basically steers), Brucella melitensis (sheep and goats), Brucella suis (swine), Brucella neotomae (desert rats), Brucellaovis (sheep), Brucella canis (canine), Brucella ceti (cetaceans) and Brucella pinnipedialis (pinnipeds). Brucellosis in sheep and goats is an infectious systemic disease characterized by abortion, the inflammation of the genitalia and fetal membranes, sterility and confined lesions in the lymphatic system and joints [2]. The main route of transmission of Brucella is the placenta, fetal fluids and vaginal discharges of the infected ewes and goats after abortion or after a full-term parturition. Shedding of Brucella is additionally basic in udder emissions and semen, Brucella might be isolated from different tissues, for example, lymph nodes from the head, spleen and reproductive organs (uterus, epididymides, testes), and arthritic lesions [3]. Brucellosis is in charge of impressive economic losses to the small ruminants industry [4]. Human Brucellosis has numerous equivalent words derived from the geographical locales in which the disease happens, e.g. Mediterranean fever, Malta fever, Gibraltar fever, Cyprus fever; or from the remittent character of the fever, e.g. Undulant fever; or from its likeness to malaria and typhoid, e.g. Typhomalarial fever, Intermittent typhoid. Brucellosis is portrayed by its regular remissions or intermissions fever [5]. Symptoms of brucellosis are for the most part non-specific and incorporate high fever, night sweats and joint pain. The clinical and laboratory features of brucellosis as a systemic disease, in which any organ of the body may be involved. Brucellosis diagnosis is complicated because of the non-specific symptoms. Brucellosis can be categorized as either acute, subacute or chronic [6]. Brucellosis is a standout amongst the most imperative and universally distributed zoonotic disease, yet brucellosis of cattle, sheep and goats are pertinent from the financial perspective and are submitted to authority control crusades all over the world [7]. The sources of exposure incorporate ingestion of unpasteurized milk, milk products and infected meat [8]. Brucellosis also linked to travel and bioterrorism, Brucella is considered as a category B pathogen biological weapon [9]. Recently different courses of transmission have been recognized like: breast milk [10]. having an infected family member [11,12] through sexual intercourse, blood transfusion and obstetrician infection during the parturition of infected baby [13]. Among the 8 species, named basically for the source animals. the accompanying 4 have moderate-to-critical human pathogenicity: Brucella melitensis (from sheep; highest pathogenicity), Brucella suis (from pigs; high pathogenicity), Brucella abortus (from cattle; moderate pathogenicity), Brucella canis (from dogs; moderate pathogenicity). Brucella melitensis is the most frequently reported as a reason for human sickness It is the most virulent species and connected with serious acute illness. It is recorded as endemic infection in a many countries and records for an inconsistent measure of human brucellosis. Published articles suggest that a more critical role is played by ruminants in human infection, which also affirmed by its more frequent isolation, which infects small ruminants, from human cases [14]. Brucellosis diagnosis is made by the isolation of Brucella species, yet this technique is effective in just 40 to 70% of cases. In this manner, laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis frequently depends on detecting particular serum antibodies [15]. Several serological tests have been used for the diagnosis of brucellosis; the Rose Bengal test, indirect Coombs test, complement fixation test, enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) [16]. ELISA is a reliable and sensitive test for the diagnosis of brucellosis. The test is quick, simple to perform [17]. ELISA has been assessed for its precision and suitability as an additional serological check for the investigation of animals brucellosis. ELISA can be utilized on a spread of animal species, and an additional point of preference is its suitability for use on low-quality specimens [1]. ELISAs are validated for incorporation in the European Union enactment on intra-community trade for diagnosing B. melitensis infection in sheep [18]. ELISA was effectively institutionalized and accepted as corroborative tests for the diagnosis of B. melitensis in sheep and goat samples (milk/sera) [19].

References

1. Ogugua AJ, Akinseye VO, Ayoola MC, Oyesola OO, Shima FK, et al. (2014) Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in goats in selected states in Nigeria and the public health implications. Afr J Med Med Sci 43:121–129.
2. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) Brucellosis.
3. Alton GG, Jones LM, Angus RD, Verger JM (1988) Techniques for the Brucellosis Laboratory. INRA, Paris, France.
4. Benkirane, A (2006) Ovine and caprine brucellosis: World distribution and control/ eradication strategies in West Asia/ North Africa region. Small Rumin Res 62: 19-25.
5. Mantur BG, Amarnath SK, Shinde  RS  (2007) Review of clinical and laboratory features of human Brucellosis 25: 188-202.
6. Young EJ (2010) Brucella Species. In: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas, Bennett’s. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2921-2925.
7. FAO/WHO/OIE (2007) Guidelines for a regional brucellosis control programme for the middle east. 
8. Cutler SJ, Whatmore AM, Commander NJ (2005) Brucellosis - New aspects of an old disease. J Appl Microbiol 98: 1270-1281.
9. Pappas G, Panagopoulou P, Christou L, Akritidis N (2006). Biological weapons: Brucella as a biological weapon. Cell Mol Life Sci. 63: 2229-2236.
10. Tikare NV, Mantur BG. Bidari LH (2008) Brucellar meningitis in an infant-Evidence for human breast milk transmission. J Trop Pediatr 54: 272-274.
11. Sofian M, Aghakhani A, Velavati AA, Banifazl M, Eslamifar A, et al. (2007) Risk factors for human brucellosis in Iran: a case-control study. Int J Infect Dis 12: 157-161.
12. Almuneef MA, Memish ZA, Balkhy HH, Alotaibi B, Algoda S, et al. (2004) Importance of screening household members of acute brucellosis cases in endemic areas. Epidemiol Infect 132: 533-540.
13. Lim HS, Min YS, Lee HS (2005) Investigation of a series of brucellosis cases in Gyeongsangbuk -do during (2003-2004). J Prev Med Pub Health 38: 482-488.
14. Yagupsky P (1999) Detection of brucellae in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 37: 3437-3442.
15. Díaz R, Moriyon I (1989) Laboratory techniques in the diagnosis of human brucellosis . FL: Boca Raton, pp: 73-83.
16. Rubio M, Barrio B, Díaz R (2001) Usefulness of Rose Bengal, Coombs and counter-immunoelectrophoresis for the diagnosis of human brucellosis cases with negative seroagglutination. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 19: 406-407.
17. Osoba AO, Balkhy H, Memish Z, Khan MY, Al-Thagafi A, et al. (2001) Diagnostic value of Brucella ELISA IgG and IgM in bacteremic and non-bacteremic patients with brucellosis. J Chemother 13: 54-59.
18. García Bocanegra I, Allepuz A, Pérez JJ, Alba A, Giovannini A, et al. (2014) Evaluation of different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the diagnosis of brucellosis due to Brucella melitensis in sheep. Vet J 199: 439-445.
19. Bosnakovski J, Mitrov D, Naletoski I (2010) Diagnostic validation of ovine and caprine brucellosis using serum- and milk-elisa. Prilozi 31: 103-115.