An early geriatric follow-up after the discharge decreases read missions

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Geriatric Research

Abstract

As part of a Triple Aim project, we examined the effect of an early geriatric follow-up after discharge in a quasi[1]randomized controlled trial of geriatric patients (≥75 years) acutely admitted to the emergency department with one of nine diagnoses: pneumonia, COPD, delirium, dehydration, urinary tract infection, constipation, anemia, heart failure, and other infections. The intervention consisted of a follow-up visit to the patient’s home on the first working day after hospital discharge. The visit was performed by a nurse and a geriatrician and tailored to the patient’s need. The control group was discharged according to standard procedures, which included follow-home or telephone follow-up. From June 2014 to November 2015, 1330 patients were included. We found a statistically significant reduction in the read mission rate in the intervention group compared to the control group (12% vs. 23%; P < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio in th intervention group was 0.50 (95%CI: 0.38-0.65). In the intervention group more patients were discharged directly from the emergency department, instead of being transferred to the geriatric ward, compared to the control group (56% vs 49% p=0.01).The intervention reduced the length of the primary hospital stay median 2 days (1–7) vs. 3 days (1–8) in the control group (p= 0.03). Preliminary data on 30 and90 day mortality show no statistically significant difference between the groups.

As part of a Triple Aim project, we examined the effect of an early geriatric follow-up after discharge in a quasi[1]randomized controlled trial of geriatric patients (≥75 years) acutely admitted to the emergency department with one of nine diagnoses: pneumonia, COPD, delirium, dehydration, urinary tract infection, constipation, anemia, heart failure, and other infections. The intervention consisted of a follow-up visit to the patient’s home on the first working day after hospital discharge. The visit was performed by a nurse and a geriatrician and tailored to the patient’s need. The control group was discharged according to standard procedures, which included follow-home or telephone follow-up. From June 2014 to November 2015, 1330 patients were included. We found a statistically significant reduction in the read mission rate in the intervention group compared to the control group (12% vs. 23%; P < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio in th intervention group was 0.50 (95%CI: 0.38-0.65). In the intervention group more patients were discharged directly from the emergency department, instead of being transferred to the geriatric ward, compared to the control group (56% vs 49% p=0.01).The intervention reduced the length of the primary hospital stay median 2 days (1–7) vs. 3 days (1–8) in the control group (p= 0.03). Preliminary data on 30 and90 day mortality show no statistically significant difference between the groups.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Flyer image

Share This Article