A necessary and appropriate condition for cancer cure is the elimination of all of a patient’s cancer stem cells (CSCs). However, CSC identification has been problematic. Cell surface biomarkers have been claimed to select SCs and CSCs. But, only a tiny fraction of the selected cells are functionally SCs or CSCs. Hill, Kern and Shibata, show that, if based on such markers, the numbers are internally inconsistent, throwing the CSC hypothesis in doubt. Functional assays do not have this problem. Agar colonies from individual patient cervical cancers showed that inherent radiosensitivity (SF2) of the cells that formed colonies was the single most important factor correlating with clinical outcomes, but large error bars prevented accurate outcome predictions for individual patients. Our Hybrid Spheroid (HS) Assay (HSA) [US Patent No.: 8,936,938] solves this problem. HSs are composed of an initial known mixture of fibroblasts and tumor cells, forming an in vivo-like ex vivo system that provides a CSC niche. HS growth curves provide the CSC fraction, the SF for each tested agent, and clinical outcome predictions for solid tumors. The impact of our HSA is 3-fold: (1) In the cancer clinic, patients predicted to fail on the standard treatment and could be offered alternatives which are also based on the assay. (2) The selection and testing of potential new therapeutic agents in the pharmaceutical industry could use the HSA to determine which agents are valuable for further clinical testing, avoiding the considerable expenses of a negative clinical trial and considerably reducing the cost and time to bring successful agents into the clinic. (3) The HSA could also be used to determine if there is a subset of patients whose tumors are susceptible to the new modality, and hence these patients could be identified by the HSA to develop a battery of agents likely to be useful on select tumors in select patients. Each of these impacts is not currently available in the clinic or in the pharmaceutical industry. The clinical impact (1) alone should lead to major increases in cancer cure rates and the second and third impacts would magnify these increases.
Gynecological cancer is currently the 6th leading cause of death around the globe of women. Despite screening campaigns, early diagnosis and vaccination against Human Papilloma Virus, gynecological cancers -mostly ovarian cancer- are often diagnosed at advanced stages and although the high effectiveness of existing medical treatments, during long term therapy as often seem insufficient to achieve the cure. This is due to presence of metastases at time of diagnosis and to developmental of resistance to cytostatic treatments and further recurrences. The discovery and understanding of Cancer Stem Cells leads to an encouraging outlook on future treatment of the patients of cancer. Within the perspective of the CSCs concept model and gynecological CSCs have specific genetic, epigenetic variations that give them capabilities to undergo asymmetric cell divisions. Ensuring new generations of CSCs and of more differentiated gynecological cancer cells. As a result of these biological capabilities, CSCs can mediate gynecological cancers occurrence, resistance to treatment and recurrence of the CSCs. This review discusses emerging evidences supporting the existence of CSCs in ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancers. The given focuses to recent molecular, genomic advances regarding the characterization of abnormal signaling cascades in these three types of gynecological CSCs. We also discuss these current knowledge on genetic and epigenetic changes in gynecological cancers and CSCs and how scientists and researchers propose that these cellular changes influence CSCs in their control of cancer development and recurrence. The subject also discuss advances in medical treatment of gynecological cancer using CSCs as a therapeutic target.
Note: This work is partly presented at 29th Euro-Global Summit on Cancer Therapy & Radiation Oncology on July 23-25, 2018 held at Rome, Italy.
Journal of Clinical Medicine and Therapeutics received 95 citations as per Google Scholar report